Nokia Squares Up to Software Rivals by Buying Symbian and Moving to Open Source

Earlier this morning, Nokia announced it would buy the 52.1 percent of Symbian shares it doesn't already hold, merge the company with its own S60 organisation and create the Symbian Foundation. This new entity will introduce an open-source licence model for the Symbian operating system and the S60, UIQ and MOAP platforms. The move's a shrewd response to growing threats from other providers of mobile phone software.

Before today, Symbian was owned by Nokia, Ericsson, Sony Ericsson, Panasonic, Siemens and Samsung. The new entity will be steered by a board of 10 members: five from phone manufacturers (Nokia, LG, Motorola, Samsung and Sony Ericsson) and five from network operators and chip makers (AT&T, NTT DoCoMo, Vodafone, STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments).

It was only a matter of time before Nokia bought out its five partners in Symbian. CCS Insight estimates Nokia paid out more than $250 million in Symbian licence fees last year, so it makes commercial sense to buy Symbian for about $410 million, rather than keep paying what is effectively a subsidy to the other shareholders.

But I think Nokia was more worried about the risk that Symbian's structure would erode its competitive position. Over the last ten years, Symbian has grown into the dominant supplier of smartphone operating systems, but it's being challenged by a variety of new contenders:

  • The LiMo Foundation has strong support from network operators, which have been attracted by its governance model. Operators believe they have more opportunity to influence the direction of this open-source platform than with Symbian and its S60 and UIQ user interfaces.

  • Apple has raised the bar from a technical perspective, and Symbian licensees need to respond quickly to its touch-screen user interface, high performance and easy-to-use development tools.

  • Google has challenged the commercial model, stating that its Android platform has reduced the cost of software to "close to zero".

Nokia will surely have considered buying Symbian and integrating it as a software platform alongside Series 30 and Series 40. Perhaps the fear of intervention by a monopoly regulator meant it favoured the creation of a stand-alone entity.

In my view, had Symbian been created today it's likely that this is the sort of structure that would have been adopted anyway — particularly given the current trend toward open-source software platforms. Ironically, it might even make Microsoft's Windows Mobile and Google's Android look overly proprietary and dominated by a single player.

If Nokia's new approach works it could be of great benefit to the Symbian platform. Wider input from network operators and chip manufacturers, as well as closer integration of the operating system and user interface should make it more stable and more attractive to operators, to developers and — let's not forget — to consumers. Alternatively, governance by committee may see it slipping even further behind. That seems difficult to believe, given that Nokia knows how urgently it has to act.

The involvement of nine other companies on the foundation's board offers an elegant way to keep other Symbian licensees committed to the platform. Sony Ericsson and Motorola need UIQ to continue in some guise to support current product road maps. NTT DoCoMo needs MOAP for the Japanese market.

But I still wonder what UIQ brings to the table, about UIQ's long-term future and whether Sony Ericsson and Motorola made the right decision to back the platform when they did. Maybe its saving grace will be its touch-screen capabilities.

At this early stage, I have a couple of questions:

  • Is it too late? It has taken a sharp increase in competition from Google, Apple and the LiMo Foundation to force this move. Perhaps Nokia should have done this after it bought Psion's 31.1 percent stake back in July 2004. This would certainly have made LiMo a less attractive proposition and Sony Ericsson and Motorola would have been able to use their resources more effectively on a unified platform.

  • Can the new entity really be open when Nokia has such a vested interest? This may be the stated goal, but in practice it might be more difficult to achieve. We'll have to scrutinise the fine print of the intellectual property rights and articles of association.

The most obvious effect is that license fees for Symbian OS and S60 will disappear. That will benefit current licensees, make Symbian extremely attractive to new entrants and push it even more rapidly into mid-tier phones. I'll be interested to see how competitors respond, especially Microsoft, Google and Qualcomm.

I can't help thinking we haven't reached the end of this story. We'll have to see how events unfold over the next few days. In the longer term, perhaps there is some truth in the rumours that Nokia has a new Linux-based software platform on the blocks for high-end multimedia devices. It seems almost unthinkable that it would consider open-sourcing Symbian and S60 if it didn't have something else up its sleeve.

This entry was posted on June 24th, 2008 and is filed under Devices. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed or you can leave a response.

Posted By Geoff Blaber On June 24th, 2008

- 2008-06-24 at 08:28
This is very interesting news and sets Nokia off on a path to be the only Symbian licensee. I've seen too many cases where a hardware manufacturer tries to license its software platform and fails. I'd love to see Nokia prove me wrong, but I think potential licensees won't see past Nokia as a competitor. There is a fundamental rule that "thou shall have separation of software and hardware". IMHO, Symbian just became a proprietary operating system.
[...] company was already paying Symbian some $250 million a year to use Symbian's software in phones, analysts say. So buying Symbian outright for $410 million is smart business. Nokia shares were down slightly in [...]
- 2008-06-24 at 16:21
[...] those of you unfamiliar with Symbian it is the software platform that powers the Nokia devices, and one analyst estimates that Nokia paid close to $250 million a year in licensing fees for it. While $410 million sounds [...]
- 2008-06-24 at 17:07
Two more comments on this announcement. 1. Sony Ericsson deserves props in hindsight for extracting money back out of their UIQ investment from Motorola. 2. A big question for potential licenses will be how much influence they have over the roadmap and how they roll their changes back into the main branch of the code base, particularly bug fixes? I think potential licenses will fear that Nokia will optimize for their products and leave licenses as a second priority.
[...] Nokia buys Symbian in web push The Guardian, 25 Jun 2008 • Nokia Squares Up to Software Rivals by Buying Symbian and Moving to Open Source CCS Insight, 24 June 2008, and comment • Can Nokia’s Symbian Foundation Nuke Google [...]
[...] Geoff Blaber at CSS Insight [...]
- 2008-06-26 at 19:55
I gave this topic some additional thought and posted an entry on my own website here: My thoughts cover this announcement from the perspective of Apple, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, LG, Motorola, Sony Ericsson, and HTC. Feel free to post your comments. -Erick
- 2008-06-29 at 08:52
[...] perhaps there is some truth in the rumours that Nokia has a new Linux-based software platform on the blocks for high-end multimedia devices [...] Of course, Nokia already has it's Linux based Maemo platform, but what fate for that in a world with a free (of charge) and free (open source) Symbian OS? Maemo is well behind even Android and MOAP(L) in terms of providing a full phone stack and application suite, and performance even on superior hardware compared to Symbian OS is poor. Perhaps more significantly, removing the royalty unblocks the way to seeing S40 on top of Symbian OS, or rather, every closed Nokia phone could one day also be based on Symbian OS.
- 2009-05-16 at 20:33
I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.
Leave a Comment

Hot News

Team Tweets

CCS Insight
Omron's HeartGuide is the latest device to blur the line between wearables and healthcare devices:…
Follow CCS Insight
Shaun Collins
RT @MarinaKoytcheva: Worth watching this session on the outlook for the digital economy at #WEF19 It may not be a humble thing to say, but…
Follow Shaun
Ben Wood
Anyone aware of any stats from insurance companies (or elsewhere) on the incidence and cost of damage caused by wat…
Follow Ben
Martin Garner
Very useful briefing just now from brett Francis @AWS on the #IoT announcements from @AWSreInvent . Good to see how…
Follow Martin
Geoff Blaber
The only thing more incredible than the 10,000 employees Amazon has dedicated to Alexa is the speed at which it’s g…
Follow Geoff
Marina Koytcheva
Worth watching this session on the outlook for the digital economy at #WEF19 It may not be a humble thing to say, b…
Follow Marina
Nicholas McQuire
Major steps in the vital march towards #mobileEdge & #CloudComputing. An important partnership from #IBM &…
Follow Nicholas
Kester Mann
RT @MarinaKoytcheva: Worth watching this session on the outlook for the digital economy at #WEF19 It may not be a humble thing to say, but…
Follow Kester
Angela Ashenden
.@slackhq has a new Chief Product Officer, Tamar Yehoshua (ex-Google) to go with its new logo: “A heartfelt thank y…
Follow Angela
George Jijiashvili
@StewartMitchell Sure - feel free to DM me if easier.
Follow George
Katie Taylor
The lifesaving food 90% aren’t eating enough of: how more fibre could prevent disease-related deaths
Follow Katie

Recent Blog Posts

Blog Post
The Right Cuff Omron's HeartGuide Tries to Steal a March on the Apple Watch... Read more
Blog Post
Microsoft Links Up with Walgreens Changes Loom over US Healthcare Market Last Tuesday, Micros... Read more
Blog Post
Fossil and Google Sign Licensing Deal Fossil to License "Advanced" Smartwatch Tech to Google Goog... Read more
More blog

Latest Company News

Blog Post
Virtual Reality Device Market Declines in 2018 But Outlook Remains Positive Research firm CCS Insight forecasts 8 million virtual realit... Read more
More news